Updated September 28, 2026
8 min read
Analytics

How to Benchmark Your Trustpilot Score Against Competitors

Comparing Like for Like When Every Profile Collects Reviews Differently

Short answer

To benchmark your Trustpilot score against competitors, compare more than the TrustScore. For each profile, record the score, reviews in the last 12 months, the share of one and two star reviews, the mix of review sources and the reply rate to negative reviews. Compare star ratings by review source where possible, because invited and organic reviews behave differently.

GB
Written byGabor Barta— Co-founder, Oppira

Gabor leads product and content at Oppira. He has spent over a decade building tools and writing about competitive intelligence, social media analytics, and growth marketing for B2B SaaS companies.

Published September 28, 2026

1. Why is comparing TrustScores directly misleading?

Because the score reflects how reviews were collected as much as how customers feel. A company inviting every customer gets a very different sample from one that never asks, and the TrustScore formula adds recency weighting and a Bayesian pull toward the middle.

Trustpilot states that the TrustScore gives more weight to recent reviews, takes into account how regularly reviews arrive, and includes seven neutral 3.5-star reviews in a Bayesian average so that new profiles start from a balanced position. That makes the score stable and hard to game, and it also means two scores are only comparable when the profiles behind them are similar.

The larger distortion is the sample. A company that invites every customer after purchase collects reviews from the quiet majority who were satisfied. A company that never invites collects reviews mostly from people motivated enough to seek out the site, and that group skews toward bad experiences. Neither is dishonest. They are simply measuring different populations.

2. What should a Trustpilot competitor benchmark include?

Six numbers per profile: TrustScore, reviews in the last 12 months, the share of one and two star reviews, the share of reviews that were invited or verified, the reply rate to negative reviews, and the typical reply speed.

Metrics for a fair Trustpilot benchmark and where each appears on a public profile
MetricWhere to find itWhat it tells you
TrustScoreProfile headerThe headline, weighted toward recent reviews
Reviews in the last 12 monthsProfile headerCurrent volume, which is more comparable than the all-time total
Share of one and two star reviewsStar distribution on the profileHow often the experience fails badly
Review source mixCompany activity page, Review sourcesHow much of the profile comes from invitations
Star rating by review sourceCompany activity page, Star ratingWhether invited and organic reviewers agree
Reply rate and speed on negative reviewsCompany activity page, RepliesHow actively the company handles failure in public
Metrics for a fair Trustpilot benchmark and where each appears on a public profileThe Company activity page covers the past 12 months. Use the same 12-month window for every metric so the comparison is not mixing periods.

3. How do I build the benchmark?

Collect the six numbers for your profile and three to five competitors on the same day, keep one row per profile, and repeat the collection monthly so the benchmark becomes a trend rather than a snapshot.

  1. Choose the competitors buyers compare you with. Three to five rivals your prospects actually consider. A benchmark against a household name in an adjacent category tells you nothing useful about the deals you lose.
  2. Confirm each profile. Profiles are tied to a domain, and some companies have several. Check the Merges section on the Company activity page and pick the profile buyers are most likely to find. Note which one you used.
  3. Record the six numbers on one day. Score, 12-month review count, one and two star share, source mix, reply rate and reply speed. Collect your own profile in the same session, with the same method.Write the date in the sheet header. The TrustScore recalculates as reviews arrive, so a number without a date cannot be compared later.
  4. Add the star rating by source. Where the Company activity page breaks star ratings down by review source, record the organic figure separately. It is the closest to a like-for-like comparison available between profiles with different invitation habits.
  5. Repeat monthly. The same six numbers each month turn a table into a trend. A competitor whose one-star share rises three months in a row is in trouble, whatever their headline score says.

4. What does a fair comparison look like in practice?

It often reverses the headline ranking. A competitor with the highest score may rely on invitations, while one with a lower score may earn similar ratings from people who were never asked.

Illustrative benchmark for three invented competitors, showing why the headline score is not enough
ProfileTrustScoreReviews, 12 monthsOne and two starInvited or verifiedReplies to negatives
Veltrix4.62,4006%MostNearly all
Sondera4.138014%About halfAbout half
Norvane3.215038%Very fewNone
Illustrative benchmark for three invented competitors, showing why the headline score is not enoughInvented figures to illustrate the method, not benchmark data. Veltrix leads on score but mostly measures invited customers. Norvane scores lowest, yet its reviews come almost entirely from people who sought out the site, and nobody answers them. The useful question is not who ranks first, but which gap you can close.

Read the table row by row for its story. Veltrix runs a mature invitation program and a reply process. Sondera is partway there. Norvane is not managing the channel at all, so its score probably understates its product and certainly understates the risk: an unmanaged profile full of unanswered complaints about slow onboarding and support is what a prospect finds when they search the brand name.

5. Which benchmark gap is worth closing?

Usually volume and replies before score. A thin profile with few recent reviews is the most common weakness for small companies, and unanswered negative reviews are the most visible. Both are fixable without touching the product.

Work through the gaps in this order:

  1. Recent volume. If rivals have many times your 12-month review count, prospects see a busier, more trusted profile regardless of the score.
  2. Replies to negative reviews. A public, specific answer to every complaint is visible on the profile and summarized on the Company activity page.
  3. Low-star share. If yours is higher than competitors with similar source mixes, the problem is the experience, and the fix is operational.
  4. The TrustScore itself. It follows from the three above, and chasing it directly is where companies drift into practices the guidelines prohibit.

6. How often should I update a Trustpilot benchmark?

Monthly for the six numbers, with a quick weekly look at new competitor reviews. The TrustScore moves slowly by design, so weekly score readings mostly record noise.

Add an unscheduled check after anything that could move reviews: a competitor launch, an outage, a pricing change, a switch to a new invitation method. Those events show up in review volume within days, and the spikes guide in this cluster covers how to read them.

On Oppira's Basic and Pro plans, Trustpilot reviews for the competitors you track are collected continuously and summarized by sentiment, so a shift in a rival's review mix surfaces in the weekly briefing instead of waiting for the monthly benchmark. Keep the six-number table yourself too, because the source mix and reply figures come from each profile's Company activity page.

Key Takeaways

The score reflects collection as well as satisfaction

Invited and unprompted reviewers are different populations, so compare the source mix before the score.

Use six numbers, not one

Score, 12-month volume, low-star share, source mix, reply rate and reply speed make a fair comparison.

Keep one 12-month window

The Company activity page covers the past year, so use the same period for every metric.

Organic ratings are the closest to like for like

Where star ratings are broken down by source, the organic figure removes most invitation effects.

Close volume and reply gaps first

They are visible to every prospect and fixable without changing the product.

Stay inside the invitation rules

Invite every customer the same way. Incentives and selective invitations breach Trustpilot guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sources

  1. TrustScore and star rating explained Trustpilot Help Center, September 2026.Recency weighting, frequency and the Bayesian average of seven 3.5-star reviews.
  2. Trustpilot's review labels Trustpilot Help Center, September 2026.What Verified, Invited and Redirected mean, which defines the source mix.
  3. Guidelines for businesses Trustpilot, June 2026.The requirement to invite consistently and fairly, and the prohibition on incentives.
  4. Action We Take Trustpilot, March 2026.Consequences of misuse, including a Consumer Warning and a hidden TrustScore.
Oppira

Turn reading into a reaction

Oppira watches your competitors, keeps your playbook current, and drafts the response. See your market clearly by tomorrow.